# Launched: Reuse logic and create nested loops with the new WithName() formula

**URL:** <https://connect.superhuman.com/t/launched-reuse-logic-and-create-nested-loops-with-the-new-withname-formula/19900>\
**Category:** News from Superhuman\
**Created:** [December 2, 2020, 10:06pm UTC](https://connect.superhuman.com/t/launched-reuse-logic-and-create-nested-loops-with-the-new-withname-formula/19900 "2020-12-02T22:06:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 44

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tamerlan\_Kagarmanov](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/e5b9ba/32.png) [@Tamerlan\_Kagarmanov](https://connect.superhuman.com/u/Tamerlan_Kagarmanov)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2023, 5:46pm UTC](https://connect.superhuman.com/t/launched-reuse-logic-and-create-nested-loops-with-the-new-withname-formula/19900/44 "2023-11-13T17:46:06Z")

</div>

> [@Launched: Reuse logic and create nested loops with the new WithName() formula](https://connect.superhuman.com/t/launched-reuse-logic-and-create-nested-loops-with-the-new-withname-formula/19900/43):
>
> Hi @shishir, First of all, I \<3 Coda and am so thankful you made such a great platform. I’ve built business tools on top of Coda that go far beyond what some commercial off-the-shelf products can do. It’s incredible! That being said (and I realize this may sound pedantic), the current syntax of WithName is a minor but consistent annoyance. When I use it many times within a complicated formula, it can make the whole thing very hard to read and follow along, as well as make the auto-indenter use…

+1 I agree, it’s inconvenient.

---

_[View the full topic](https://connect.superhuman.com/t/launched-reuse-logic-and-create-nested-loops-with-the-new-withname-formula/19900)._