# List of options, summarized in a different table by month

**URL:** <https://connect.superhuman.com/t/list-of-options-summarized-in-a-different-table-by-month/21444>\
**Category:** Ask the Community\
**Created:** [February 14, 2021, 10:53am UTC](https://connect.superhuman.com/t/list-of-options-summarized-in-a-different-table-by-month/21444 "2021-02-14T10:53:15Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Christiaan\_Huizer](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/coda1/user_avatar/connect.superhuman.com/christiaan_huizer/32/28269_2.png) [@Christiaan\_Huizer](https://connect.superhuman.com/u/Christiaan_Huizer)\
**Post date:** [February 15, 2021, 9:28am UTC](https://connect.superhuman.com/t/list-of-options-summarized-in-a-different-table-by-month/21444/6 "2021-02-15T09:28:31Z")

</div>

this is helpful insight @Federico_Stefanato

it seems to imply that once you have a list filled with single items (seperated by a comma) the `In()` is maybe the way to go, while having a sublist `[[sublist1],[sublist2],[sublist3]]` `Contains()` looks like the right candidate.

I would love to understand better when to apply a function.

> (\*)  
> “Somehow”, because `In()` accepts a single value search while `Contains()` searches for sublist within a list, therefore the former _should_ be more performant (it really depends on the underlying implementation: don’t take this as a statement).

---

_[View the full topic](https://connect.superhuman.com/t/list-of-options-summarized-in-a-different-table-by-month/21444)._