Hi @Alan_Larsen1 - I’m the creator of the Pack, glad you’re enjoying it!
This took me a bit of hacking to get right, but here’s the formula that worked for me:
thisRow.[IMDb Genre List]
.Split(", ")
.ForEach(
GenresTable.Filter(GenreName=CurrentValue)
)
.ListCombine()
So what the heck is going on here? Mostly a whole bunch of stuff to massage things into the type of data Coda is expecting at each stage. Let me break it down:
-
.Split(", ")- The list of genres is just a bunch of text; Coda doesn’t realize it’s a list. To convert it to a true list in Coda’s mind, we need to take that text, and split it up into separate items anytime we see", "(a comma followed by a space) - Now we’ve got a list! Let’s look at each item in the list individually with
forEach() - For each of these items, we want to match it to the corresponding record in our Genres table (
GenresTable.Filter(GenreName=CurrentValue), where CurrentValue is the current item from that list we created, and GenreName is what I called my display column in my Genres table) - You’d think this would be enough lol, but the result comes out as
[Action], [Drama]instead ofAction, Drama, so we need to go one more step further and say “hey, everything that theForEachfunction spits out? I want you to mash that all into a Coda list usingListCombine()” (because when Coda is asking you for multiple lookups, it’s asking you for a list of those lookups)
Phew! Maybe someone can come along with a more elegant solution (most of this is Coda fundamentals, not IMDb-Pack-specific), but in the meantime, this should work.
Also, curious about your use case! I’m always interested to hear what people are doing with the Pack.
Edit: Instead of ListCombine(), you could add .First() at the end of GenresTable.Filter(GenreName=CurrentValue). Up to you. The problem is that Filter() always returns a list, even if it’s a list of 1. You can either combine those lists together with ListCombine(), or force Filter() to return only the first (and usually only) item with .First()
*Edit2: In retrospect, I probably could have designed the Pack to spit out a list of text objects, not a single text object with commas in it. I might change this. If this formula breaks on you in the future, the solution will be to remove Split() (cause I’ll be doing that for you in the Pack)