Yes.
But, while I developed this tool, I do not own it and I am prevented under NDA and contract from showing it to anyone. This is not to say that I couldn’t build another similar solution - I just can’t use the basis of my client’s solution for any other engagement; I have to start over. And frankly, there are new features and functionality in Coda itself, and ML offerings that I would leverage anyway.
I do have the latitude to use it for my own tests and continued support of the tool for the client, so I use it for stuff like this. It’s a great competitive intelligence approach that happens to generate reports in Coda, which is ideal (as you know).
Further…
… searches it with a base of terms (including these negatives) …
It’s a little more involved than this because it’s creating the “base” of terms using NLP and other machine-learning technologies. Your summation is accurate though.
And…
… pushes all that into a table for reference??
It’s an oversimplification, but yes - you get the concept. As I’ve intimated many times in this community, Coda is ideal for blending data with narratives. This tool’s process also - with the help of AI - authors three key narratives about the findings including aggregate metrics such as how many instances of negative sentiment vs positive sentiment. These are expressed in an easy-reading format instead of only a bunch of records and data points.
Coda can do it; the only question is what does “it” mean and do you have enough money to make “it” happen? 