I love Coda but I feel obligated to reluctantly use Notion due to its vast library of connectors. In an ideal world, Coda is the database, Claude can read/write to it, and Granola funnels all meeting notes into Coda. I can set this up in 5 minutes in Notion and it’s driving me crazy that I can’t here. I feel like Coda is going to lose a large base of users without this flexibility. Thoughts?
2 Likes
Hey @Jordan_Moore1 ! Just wrote you a DM re: MCP access.
2 Likes
Having a Coda MCP would be awesome… I use Claude and Cursor. So It would help me bring in data generated by the Ai and also read from Coda
1 Like
@Edward_Battistini1 Just sent you a DM!
1 Like
Are you aware of Coda‘s packs? There are 500+ available.
1 Like
Packs help for fixed API connections, but they don’t really replace MCP once Claude or Cursor becomes the interface. The gap is bidirectional context: letting the model read a doc or table, write rows back, and chain that with other tools in one loop. I can patch pieces of this today with Packs + automations + webhooks, but it gets brittle fast once you want doc context, row updates, and meeting-note ingestion in the same workflow.
2 Likes
The OP was about Notion was necessary for the OP, because Notion has Connectors and CODA does not.
As far as MCP goes, the Coda/Superhuman/Grammarly MCP is in Beta at the moment.
1 Like